<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Property tax refund question for state of Minnesota?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freeminnesotahomesearch.net/property-tax-refund-question-for-state-of-minnesota/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freeminnesotahomesearch.net/property-tax-refund-question-for-state-of-minnesota</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byrne H</title>
		<link>http://freeminnesotahomesearch.net/property-tax-refund-question-for-state-of-minnesota/comment-page-1#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrne H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freeminnesotahomesearch.net/property-tax-refund-question-for-state-of-minnesota#comment-844</guid>
		<description>I would be careful about this one. If the IRS sees that ownership changed without money changing hands, and the result was a tax benefit, they might think you were doing something unethical. There isn&#039;t any specific reason that either one of you should be entitled to the $648. I mean, you&#039;re living in a house because of them, so presumably that money is a tiny fraction of the total benefit you get from this transaction. On the other hand, if they can afford to let you live in a house but can&#039;t afford to miss a few hundred dollars they didn&#039;t even see coming, something else is up.

I would recommend that you agree to some split that will apply to this tax payment and all future tax payments from the house. You don&#039;t want to have this argument every year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be careful about this one. If the IRS sees that ownership changed without money changing hands, and the result was a tax benefit, they might think you were doing something unethical. There isn&#8217;t any specific reason that either one of you should be entitled to the $648. I mean, you&#8217;re living in a house because of them, so presumably that money is a tiny fraction of the total benefit you get from this transaction. On the other hand, if they can afford to let you live in a house but can&#8217;t afford to miss a few hundred dollars they didn&#8217;t even see coming, something else is up.</p>
<p>I would recommend that you agree to some split that will apply to this tax payment and all future tax payments from the house. You don&#8217;t want to have this argument every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carsonkip</title>
		<link>http://freeminnesotahomesearch.net/property-tax-refund-question-for-state-of-minnesota/comment-page-1#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>carsonkip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freeminnesotahomesearch.net/property-tax-refund-question-for-state-of-minnesota#comment-845</guid>
		<description>If you make the payments then you pay the taxes so it&#039;s your refund, however, if you would have done your own taxes or payed someone to do them, you might not have filed a M1PR and you wouldn&#039;t be asking this question. I say give your dad money for doing your taxes for you about $220 is fair for a 1040 and a M1PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you make the payments then you pay the taxes so it&#8217;s your refund, however, if you would have done your own taxes or payed someone to do them, you might not have filed a M1PR and you wouldn&#8217;t be asking this question. I say give your dad money for doing your taxes for you about $220 is fair for a 1040 and a M1PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
